What nature can tags be of?

The approach to use only tags for interest determination brings some new questions.

Not only that even tags that won’t get useable data from encyclopedias are maybe good to use in other context, e.g. all the geo-information provided via tag can be used to get data about users locations when providing data.

But what nature can tags be?

  • numbers e.g. years
  • ratings
  • recommenddations for other users beginning  with “for:” (delicious)
  • reminders like toRead, toDo (and similar noptations 2Read)
  • opinions e.g. fun, funny, humor
  • geography data starting with “geo:” or “ge:”
  • mechanical tags with prefixes like “filetype:”

Is this all? Are there more then this? Does anyone bring it into order? Maybe Metatagging, will do but do you know?

3 Responses to “What nature can tags be of?”

  1. sebastian says:

    Organising tags matt calls herding tags, nice comparison.

  2. Regine says:

    To find more inspriation maybe a look at the microformats opens another window …
    WikiPedia is also working on how to get microformats integrated in the mediawiki-software.

  3. sebastian says:

    very interesting to read for that topic: Danah Boyds report “Position Paper, Tagging, Taxonomy, Flickr, Article, ToRead” and in addition Gene Smith with “Taxonomy of tagging systems”

Leave a Reply